🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are more and more enabling the far right to dictate the political agenda, according to a new research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this phenomenon has unwittingly helped radical groups by validating their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from six national publications.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core themes like assimilation and migration, established parties progressively adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these ideas and indicated to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Public communication by mainstream political groups is crucial in the voting performance of the far right," explained a political sociologist participating in the study.

"This factor has been underestimated," she added.

The effect was noticeable even when mainstream parties were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."

Mainstreaming Effect Throughout the Continent

While the study was focused on the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to apply to nations across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British news outlets," explained another researcher. "Radical groups says something and everyone begins discussing it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Political Discourse

At certain points, leaders have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the radical right.

In a recently published discussion, a then German chancellor called for large-scale expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable examples can be found across Europe, as politicians from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has created an echo chamber that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Core Problem: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing cultural issues – migration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of narrative control," clarified a researcher.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the radical right, even as research indicates that this approach drives voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Public Perception

The scope of data gathered showed that the influence of radical groups had been progressive and had increased with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," commented a co-author. "However, when you encounter this pessimistic narrative around migration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Mainstream Parties to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The research emphasized the need for established political parties to develop their own discourses, especially on subjects such as immigration and integration, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be playing."